Moral Dilemma Saving Mother or Baby Life Christian

Morality is fun to debate. At the cease of concluding Dec, I posted a listing of another 10 dilemmas. Past the comments submitted, I realize many did not feel that they had sufficient debatable merit. Therefore, I have posted ten more, which I call up volition be more than thought provoking and agonizing than my starting time list. Please tell us what you would do in each scenario via comments.

10

Doctor'southward Sick Patients

You are a very skilled medico with five dying patients, each of whom needs a different organ in order to live. Unfortunately, there are no organs available to perform any of the transplants. It just so happens that you accept a sixth dying patient, suffering from a fatal illness, who volition die sooner than the other 5 if not treated. If this 6th patient dies, you will be able to use his organs to save the five other patients. However, you have a medicine yous can give to this 6th patient that will cure his affliction and he won't die. Would y'all:

a: Wait for the patient to die and then harvest his organs or
b: Save the patient even though the other patients won't become organs.

If you chose to administer the medicine, would you still practice so even if the medicine will non cure the patient, but, instead, delay his death to some short term future appointment or time subsequently the five patients volition have died? Why?

Yous have witnessed a man rob a bank, only then, he did something completely unusual and unexpected with the money. He donated information technology to an orphanage that was poor, run-downward and lacking in proper food, care, water and amenities. The sum of money would be a great do good to the orphanage, and the children's lives would turn from poor to prosperous. Would you:

a: Phone call the police and written report the robber, even though they would likely have the coin away from the orphanage, or
b: Do cypher and go out the robber and the orphans alone?

Your best friend is well-nigh to get married. The ceremony volition be performed in 1 hour, but you have seen, just earlier coming to the hymeneals, that your friend's fiancee has been having an affair. If your friend marries this woman, she is unlikely to exist faithful, only on the other mitt, if yous tell your friend almost the matter, you lot will ruin his wedding. Would you, or would you not, tell your friend of the affair?

You are head of a educatee council at a high schoolhouse, and are faced with a difficult determination regarding a course-twelve daughter'south risky, concluding-resort pick. This girl is an award educatee. All through her bookish years, she has obtained direct A's, has many friends and has never been disciplined by the principal. All the same, well-nigh the stop of her grade twelve yr, she barbarous ill with the influenza and fell way behind in her school work. She missed three weeks of class, which resulted in her having to rush a written report that would be worth 40% of English, a required graduation subject area in her curriculum. She was so drastic about the report that she went online and passed off a study she found on that subject as her own. Her English teacher caught her and has referred her to you. If y'all enter on her academic tape that she plagiarized, she will likely not be eligible to be accepted into St. Steven's University, a school she has dreamed of attending all through high schoolhouse and needs in order to fulfill her academic and future dreams.
What would you practice?

You are a programmer at a photo outlet. At that place have been half-dozen instances over the past several weeks in which the aforementioned parents have taken film to yous for developing. In those pictures you take processed, you lot have seen those parents with a little boy, obviously their immature son. In three of those half dozen cases, the child appeared to exist injured in some way. I fourth dimension, he had a bruise, 1 fourth dimension he had a burn down, in one case he had multiple bruises and a cast. The starting time time y'all saw him with some degree of injury, you just thought to yourself, "Well, kids will be kids," merely, now that you have seen him this way three out of half dozen times, you are starting to grow concerned that these parents could be abusing their child.

Yous know the policy at your outlet is to "Report questionable photos", but you fear that if yous do so, the police volition take outrageous measures to try to "protect" this child. The parents could be totally innocent afterwards all, just a child protective agency may take the kid without any thought. This would leave the parents facing criminal charges, an expensive court example and possibly take to keep fighting to win their kid back, fifty-fifty if found not guilty.

On the other hand, possibly the parents are harming their son and to non intervene would mean he volition have to suffer more than of this cruel treatment, mayhap indefinitely.
You consider request his parents what the relationship is between them and their child, but for all you know, they might only lie to protect themselves.
What would y'all do?

A human being/woman (whichever is contrary your gender), is immortal, considering (s)he and his/her family have drank from a fountain of youth, not knowing what it was. You lot are now in dearest with this person and have felt this manner long enough that you know (due south)he to be your destiny. All the same, the only way you tin can stay together forever is if you drink from the fountain of youth and become immortal, as well. If you exercise this, still, your family and everyone else you know will grow old and eventually die, and you will never be reunited in sky with them, or your loved ones that yous accept known, who have already died. On the other manus, if you don't drink from the fountain, you will grow old and somewhen die, and the person with whom you are in love will never see you over again, and be condemned to an eternity of loneliness and simply memories of you. What would you do?
(From Constrict Everlasting, by Natalie Babbitt)

4

Concentration Campsite, Revised

You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A sadistic baby-sit is about to hang your son who tried to escape, and is telling you to pull the chair out from under him. He says that if you don't exercise then, the guard will kill not merely your son who tried to escape, but likewise your other son, who is some other innocent inmate. You accept no doubt that he means what he says. What would you do?

In that location is a train that, much to your horror, is nigh to run over your grown upward son, who has been tied to its track. It just so happens that you lot have just enough fourth dimension to flip a switch that will send the railroad train down a different track, saving your son. Nonetheless, tied to the other rail, is your granddaughter, the girl of the very son in danger of being run over. Your son is begging and pleading with yous non to flip the switch, not to impale his daughter. What would you do?

A very evil, uncontrollably murderous man tried to impale your son as a baby, simply simply succeeded in killing your son'south aunt and uncle, who were babysitting him. Since the murders, y'all fled into hiding, but at present, you have discovered, in a prophecy, that when he tried to impale your son, a slice of the murderer'due south soul left him and went into your son. For your son to defeat him, he must go forth and let the murderer impale him, destroying the piece of the murderer's soul within your son. Otherwise, his slice of soul, within your son, will make the villain able to render if his body were destroyed. Your son has courageously accepted his fate and decides that he must die in gild for his friends and allies to bring nigh the death of the villain and bring peace to the world, because it'south the only way. Equally his female parent or father, would you:

a: Concord him back, because you love him besides much to let him go, and feel you need to protect him equally a parent, or
b: Take his fate and pick just similar he did and let him die. (Modified from Harry Potter past Joanne Rowling)

Jim has the responsibility of filling a position in his house. His friend Paul has applied and is qualified, but someone else seems even more than qualified. Jim wants to give the job to Paul, but he feels guilty, believing that he ought to be impartial. That'due south the essence of morality, he initially tells himself. This belief is, however, rejected, as Jim resolves that friendship has a moral importance that permits, and perhaps even requires, partiality in some circumstances. Then he gives the chore to Paul. Was he correct?

greenningdom.blogspot.com

Source: https://listverse.com/2011/04/18/10-more-moral-dilemmas/

Share this post